|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
H-glaze
See new evidence and revised
conclusions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 1993, two crop circle researchers,
Peter Sørensen and Busty Taylor, noticed a distinctive area of stubble
in a recently harvested field. It seemed to them that it might have been
the site of a crop formation. They reported that sufficient of the
crop had been left by the harvester for them to see the outline of the
pattern. They also noticed that a brown deposit was on both the flattened
remains of the crop and on the ground. It was concentrated in three areas
where the crop appeared to have been tightly swirled into circles of about
1 to 2 metres diameter. The deposit varied in thickness. In places it
did little more than stain the ground but there were also areas where
it was thick enough to have the appearance of having flowed over the ground.
The researchers collected samples and it was quickly noticed that the
deposit responded to a magnetic field - an observation that led to its
being given the
name H-glaze. Some samples were sent to Levengood in America who later
published a report1. I first became aware of this case in 1999
and, discovering that a few samples remained in the possession of its
discoverers, requested that they should be made available for further
scientific testing. Taylor supplied me with one small fragment but Sørensen
kindly gave me all of the
few remaining samples in his possession. I am most grateful for this generosity
and the opportunity to bring to public notice the details of this extraordinary
case.
The examination of these samples is my present priority. These
pages will be updated as soon as new information becomes available.
|
|
|
The
Site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
This
diagram (which is not to scale) was drawn by Peter Sørensen and depicts
the lay of the crop visible even after harvesting. The two main components
of the design were approximately 15 metres in diameter and 60 metres apart.
The glaze was noticeable, coating the limestone soil and the flattened stems,
leaves and seed-heads within the swirled regions indicated in red. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
location of the find was a field south of the Yatesbury turn-off on the
A4 in Wiltshire, England. The fields in the area are strewn with chalk brought
to the surface by ploughing. There are also a great many nodules of flint
(flint is almost pure silica and occurs naturally in chalk). On my first
visit to the area, I discussed the find with the farmer. He stated that
it had rained immediately prior to his noticing the damaged crop and, soon
afterwards, he had harvested the field. He only noticed the deposit during
harvesting. He had not seen anything like it before and could not offer
an explanation for it. There was nothing unusual about that particular area
of the field. There were no unusual mineral deposits nor rusting ironwork
of any kind in the area. He did all his own spraying and had not emptied
out the contents of the tanks of his spraying equipment in the field (Some
fertilizers precipitate elemental Iron when exposed to strong sun light). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levengood,
W.C. and Burke, J.A. (1995) Semi-Molten Meteoric Iron Associated with a Crop
Formation. Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 191-199. |
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
1 of 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |